Blog Library

I've spent a lot of years on the wrong side of a table from a retail buyer, and the thing you learn to hear is the question underneath the question.

For a long time it was: what's your price, and can you hold it.

Somewhere in the last few years it quietly became: if this goes sideways, whose name is on it?

That's not a sourcing question. That's a brand question. And it means the deal we all grew up with is dead.

Here's the deal we grew up with. Private label was the trade-down. Cheaper, a little worse, and everybody was fine with that because everybody understood the terms. The shopper saved three bucks and accepted a slightly sadder product. The retailer took the margin. The national brand kept the crown and the ad budget that came with it.

Over. And I don't think the industry has actually absorbed that yet. We've absorbed the numbers — the share shift, the “private label is having a moment” headlines. We have not absorbed what the numbers mean.

Shoppers didn't trade down. They tried the store brand and it was fine. Better than fine, sometimes. And then they stayed. Not because they were broke. Because they weren't wrong.

Somewhere in there they stopped turning the package over looking for a name they recognized and started turning it over to read the back. Those are not the same act. One is loyalty. The other is scrutiny. And you cannot buy your way out of scrutiny — I've watched brands with enormous budgets try, and the two-star average just sits there, patient, telling the truth.

So the trust moved. Fine. Good, honestly.

But here's the thing nobody put in the deck. The risk moved with it.

When your store brand is the cheap option, a bad product is a refund. Annoying. Survivable. When your store brand is the trusted option, a bad product is a betrayal — and the person who got betrayed is standing in your store, looking at your sign. There's no vendor's logo on the front to eat it for you. You wanted the loyalty. It came with the liability.

Which should have changed how these programs get run. Mostly it hasn't.

Sourcing is a brand decision now. The cheapest compliant supplier and the right supplier are not the same supplier, and I say that as someone who has been the more expensive one and lost. Compliance is a floor. It tells you what won't get you sued. It tells you nothing about what will get you believed.

Benchmarking has to stop being the whole job, too. Build to match the category leader and the very best you can be is a good copy of somebody's old idea, arriving late. Great strategy when the assignment was approximate the trusted thing, cheaper. Terrible one when the assignment is be the trusted thing.

Then there's speed. This is the one that stings.

The long approval chain, the eleven sign-offs, the committee — all of it was built for a world where mistakes were cheap because expectations were low. That world's gone. The people winning right now are letting whoever is closest to the product make the call, and letting them make it fast.

And that's the part I can't dress up for you.

You can write a process down and hand it to anybody. You cannot write judgment down. You can't hire it off a résumé, either, and I know that because I've been in rooms where extremely credentialed people approved a product not one of them would have taken home. The spec cleared. The margin worked. Nobody in the room felt like it was theirs.

The shelf does not care where anybody went to school. It cares whether the woman who signed that formula would hand it to her own kid.

So, look. The trust you're holding right now — you didn't earn it. The incumbents got lazy, the information got free, and it landed in your lap. That's not an insult. That's just what happened.

But unearned trust only spends once.

Spend it like you know that.

Find out more at rtmnexus.com.
--

Heather Roberts spent eight years building a consumer brand from zero into national retail distribution. She is the Founder & CEO of MOAB (Mother of All Brands).